Marginal Notes on Benghazi

On page 130 of my novel, The Hammer of God, the Ambassador to Egypt is kidnapped. This becomes the center issue of a dramatic debate, which is, I am sure, as old as terror and as fresh as yesterday:  Do you negotiate with terrorists?

As I was writing the scenes that take place in the Oval Office, the words got heated between the Secretary of State and the President. Both entrenched in their diametrically opposed positions, with the President not wanting to accede to the kidnapping and thereby instantly create an open season on US Ambassadors worldwide, while the Sec State wanted some back channel trade to release a mastermind terrorist that America was holding – in a super-max in the middle of the country.  To help me keep the beats of this ethical dilemma straight, I made a note: “The President is saving all future Ambassadors, the Sec State is trying to save the current one.”  This sub-textual motivation helped me keep the arguments between my characters aligned.

Yesterday, I was cleaning my desk, and found my notes from the blog I wrote, “Benghazi and Impotence”. Posted on September 15, 2012, when I ran across something that, even though I had seen, had no meaning on Sept. 15th but I believe does today.  I will attempt to retype it as I wrote it in marginal chicken-scratch of my early 2010 draft of my novel (pictured below).

The writing process: Plot twists and chicken-scratch.

“DS inside plot SS .  Take Amb, trade Sheik, back ch.  B&R disobey ‘unmolest’. Start real FF w/Friendlies.” Bring back CS to unc? Does JeA have GF?”

Okay, so that’s how I really write (misspellings and all) and it even took me a minute to decipher what I jotted down two years ago, here’s the handy-dandy index:

DS inside Plot SS – The kidnapping of the Ambassador was a plot hatched within the Diplomatic Security Service at the Direction of the Sec State. The plan was to force to force a back channel, out-of-the-news prisoner exchange of the Ambassador for a terrorist mastermind Sheik who was caught and held in America.

Take Amb, trade Sheik, back ch. – It’s all staged as a pretext, so naturally, the “bad guys are in on it.”  Both sides are play acting, making believe.  Why?  Because America is really trading the Sheik for 24-suitcase nukes that can wind up in the hands of terrorists. So the kidnapping and subsequent trade for the Ambassador is the cover story to excuse the release of the Sheik, so we could take the nukes out of circulation.

B&R disobey ‘unmolest’ – But two Special Forces guys, Bridgestone & Ross, don’t know it’s a scam and defy the order to allow, unmolested, the transit of bad guys.  In fact, they respond the way dedicated Special Ops and Navy Seals are trained to respond and try to interdict with deadly force.

Start real FF w/Friendlies – So all of the sudden, the play actors on the other side are taking real fire from two US operators who are actually trying to kill them. “That wasn’t very sporting. Using real bullets.” to quote James Mason to Leo G. Carroll in North By Northwest.  So what was originally a staged event became a real firefight and the other side, now feeling betrayed, kill their prisoner.

Bring back CS to unc? – Means: Do I bring back my reporter, Carly Simmone – a character from my first book, The Eighth Day - as an investigative reporter (with a grudge against the current administration) who uncovers the deceptive plot?

Does JeA have GF?  – Or is the plot unraveled by the lead kidnapper, and planner of the deception gone wrong Jamal El Azam’s girlfriend who can’t believe her boyfriend, the American State Department Security guard (and inside man at the embassy.) would ever be a traitor. She knows he must have been following orders.

As readers of The Hammer of God know, I ultimately went in a whole different direction with the kidnap plot.

Those notes above are from 2010. These notes below are from yesterday:

Navy Seals ordered to Stand Down during attack of Benghazi consulate. – Two former Navy Seals disobeyed “Stand Down order” and engaged “enemy”.  7-hour firefight ensued.  “Real bullets”.  4 dead.

Oh, and one last note: a headline from Britain’s Daily Mail:

Egypt’s new president vows to free blind sheikh tied to 1993 WTC bombing

By ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORTER

PUBLISHED: 16:10 EST, 29 June 2012 | UPDATED: 16:15 EST, 29 June 2012

Read more:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2166718/Mohammed-Morsi-Egypts-New-President-Vows-To-Free-Blind-Sheikh-Tied-To-1993-WTC-Bombing.html#ixzz2Axqn3Pnx

That’s why I call this blog, It’s only Fiction ‘til It Happens.

12 thoughts on “Marginal Notes on Benghazi

  1. Pingback: The Case For ‘Kill on Sight’ | Tom Avitabile

  2. Pingback: More Marginal Notes on Benghazi | Tom Avitabile

  3. Hey! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy
    reading your blog posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums
    that cover the same topics? Many thanks!

  4. Wow that was odd. I just wrote an really long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again.
    Regardless, just wanted to say great blog!

  5. hello!,I really like your writing so much! proportion we keep in touch extra approximately your post on AOL?
    I require an expert on this area to solve my problem.
    Maybe that is you! Looking ahead to look you.

  6. Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I have came upon so far. But, what concerning the conclusion? Are you positive about the source?

  7. You’re so awesome! I don’t believe I have read a single
    thing like this before. So great to find somebody with some genuine thoughts on this subject.

    Really.. many thanks for starting this up.
    This web site is one thing that is needed on the web, someone
    with a bit of originality!

  8. I’ve been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found
    any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth
    enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters
    and bloggers made good content as you did,
    the net will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  9. Wonderful items from you, man. I’ve bear in mind your
    stuff prior to and you are simply extremely
    great. I really like what you have got here, really like what you’re
    stating and the best way during which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take
    care of to stay it wise. I can’t wait to read much more from you.
    That is actually a terrific site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s